You Asked

You Asked: Should We All Go Vegetarian or Vegan to Reduce Our Carbon Footprint?

by |September 26, 2019

You Asked” is a series where Earth Institute experts tackle reader questions on science and sustainability. In honor of Climate Week NYC and the Covering Climate Now initiative, we’re focusing on your questions about climate change.

The following questions were submitted through our Instagram page by our followers. The answer was provided by Maureen Raymo.

Maureen Raymo

Maureen Raymo is a paleoclimatologist at Columbia’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and an advisor for Hold the Beef. Photo: Kalman Zabarsky for Boston University Photography

What is the real role of vegetarianism? Does it really help in terms of carbon footprint?

What would happen if everyone went vegetarian or vegan?

When it comes to vegetarianism or going vegan, this is a decision that would definitely help the environment and climate. CO2 and methane emissions would decrease and fertilizer and water usage would decrease. However, you can achieve most of these benefits by just reducing your beef consumption. I appreciate that food choice is a personal and cultural decision. The point I want to make is that cutting your beef consumption by half, by 90 percent, or even completely are all thoughtful, scientifically informed, good-for-the-planet decisions that an individual can make.

Our diet-related environmental burdens are in no way minuscule. These burdens include using almost half of the land that spans the United States, whilst emitting more than 70 percent of the nitrogen runoff that can choke rivers and streams. To produce all the food we buy regularly, 40 percent of the country’s fresh water is continuously extracted from underground stores. All in all, agriculture produces 20 percent of the nation’s greenhouses gas emissions.

Numerous studies have found that beef production contributes to about 90 percent of the above mentioned environmental problems. This is because vast areas of land have to be taken over and converted into grazing grounds. Also, beef production uses the most irrigation water and emits far higher greenhouse gases (41 percent) than other types of meat.

The average American eats around 460 grams of beef every week. We have found that cutting that down to 200 grams instead could make the U.S. beef industry much more environmentally sustainable and friendly.

While vegetarian diets are seen as far more sustainable, recent studies are finding that a diet which includes small portions of meat can have a lower carbon footprint. In 2016, we launched the website, which includes facts and figures from a 2016 study carried out by the graduate students of the Columbia School of International and Public Affairs. This is another great resource to gain a better understanding of the impacts of different types of meat, vegetables, and dairy products as well.

To answer the question on whether going vegan helps in terms of reducing carbon footprint, the short answer is: yes. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, after beef production, cattle milk is responsible for the most emissions (20 percent) on a commodity basis. The two major greenhouse gases that are being emitted due to animal agriculture are methane and nitrous oxide, because of manure storage and the use of fertilizers, respectively.

So, while going vegan would certainly help the environment, it is also unrealistic for most people to follow a dairy-free and meat-free diet. Almost as good is to consume meat and other animal products in moderation. And most especially, hold the beef!

Get our newsletter

I'd like to get more stories like this.
Email address
Secure and Spam free...

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
2 Comment authors
ChristinaAshley Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

It is really disappointing and irresponsible when experts acknowledge the tremendous benefits a vegan diet would have for the climate and environment, then in the same breath say with a shrug, “But don’t worry, that doesn’t mean you should go vegan!” Or, in the case of this author, “So, while going vegan would certainly help the environment, it is also unrealistic for most people to follow a dairy-free and meat-free diet.” What is this obsession with moral pandering? If you know it’s the right thing to do, a good thing to do, why not simply stop short at saying, “Yes,… Read more »


A statement like “it is also unrealistic for most people to follow a dairy-free and meat-free diet” is not only unscientific, it’s a facile (and fallacious) use of cynicism that is frequently employed by people who know the more ethical choice is one they could and should adopt, but who would prefer to continue indulging their own moral laziness, so project this same inertia and apathy onto everyone else. It is not “unrealistic for most people” with plentiful access to plant-based foods to adopt a plant-based diet; on the contrary, the numbers are growing significantly. That’s an empty and self-serving… Read more »


Why would it be unrealistic “for most people” to go vegan, at least your average audience in the West? We eat “vegan” staples all the time (tofu, nuts, rice, bread, beans, lentils) and plant based specialty items are sold in all major grocery stores, with the market continuing to grow quickly. If these diets are significantly more environmentally friendly, as we know they are, please refrain from sharing inaccurate justifications for not partaking in that behavior. If everyone made an effort (perhaps through encouragement by leaders in the field) to be more plant based, the food industry would respond by… Read more »