The Science of Carbon Dioxide and Climate

by |March 10, 2017
Temperature vs. CO2, 1880-2013. (U.S. National Climate Assessment, via Climate Central)

Temperature vs. CO2, 1880-2013. (U.S. National Climate Assessment, via Climate Central)

The vast majority of scientists around the world agree that our climate is changing at a faster rate than ever recorded in human history because of our use of fuels such as coal and oil, so-called fossil fuels.

The conclusion rests on basic physics known since the 19th century, when physical scientists first recognized that carbon dioxide, then a recently discovered gas, could act as a sort of greenhouse, preventing heat introduced by the Sun from escaping back as thermal radiation into space—the “greenhouse effect.” The heat trapped by carbon dioxide warms our oceans and atmosphere. This effect is what enables life on this planet, keeping Earth at a livable global temperature. But changes in the concentrations of these gases change the amount of heat that remains here.

The concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere—measured in parts per million of carbon dioxide—has drastically increased since the start of the Industrial Revolution, in the 18th Century. When fossil fuels are burned to produce electricity, or to heat and cool buildings, or to power machines, carbon dioxide is released. Human emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and other activities are feeding vast amounts of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere—recently around 2.4 million pounds per second. The changes to our climate largely match the effects expected from the increase in emission of greenhouse gases.

Scientists have observed the results: The Earth’s average temperature has risen about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit since 1900, with the trend accelerating since 1950. Specific places are warming much faster. The signs of early spring are all around us, and not just this year. Global temperature in 2016 was the warmest since 1880, when such record-keeping began. We have set records for the highest global average surface temperature three years in a row.

That this global warming phenomenon is largely caused by the world’s use of fossil fuels was documented by the  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which represents the scientists of nearly all the Earth’s nations, and whose findings have been officially endorsed by basically all of the world’s national governments. The conclusion also comes from other international bodies such as the World Meteorological Organization, and within the United States, from our universities, private research institutions, and all the relevant government agencies and advisory bodies, including NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the U.S. Geological Survey, the National Academy of Sciences, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA designated carbon dioxide as a dangerous pollutant, and the U.S. judiciary upheld the designation.

While natural cycles have long driven climate shifts on scales of tens, hundreds, thousands and millions of years, the rate of change we are seeing today far exceeds anything historically observed. Eons ago, crocodile-like creatures inhabited what is now the Arctic. Just 15,000 years ago, a mile of ice lay over what is now the New Jersey Turnpike. Heat waves and droughts have ravaged ancient civilizations. We know all this because scientists have for decades been analyzing ancient signs of these events locked in ice cores, tree rings, cave formations, corals, lake bottoms, ocean sediments, and other natural records. These are the same scientists telling us that the changes we are seeing now are primarily due to human emissions—not natural causes.

Here are some facts on natural change. The most powerful drivers of long-term swings, from ice ages to warm periods, are variations in Earth’s orbit, but orbital changes take place over tens or hundreds of thousands of years; they do not explain the changes that scientists have observed over the last century. The energy output of the sun itself also varies—but as measured over the last century, it has changed very little, so that process does not explain anything either. Particles spewed by volcanoes can also affect the climate—but mainly to cool it temporarily, as we saw after the 1991 eruption of the Philippines’ Mt. Pinatubo.

The increase in global temperature has multiple impacts across the Earth—sea level rise, changing precipitation patterns, warming oceans, melting glaciers, ecosystem changes—and much more.

Some key pieces of the modern science, including understanding natural climate cycles and how human influences differ from them, have been done at our Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, starting in the 1950s.

Ice cores tell us that the atmosphere’s carbon dioxide levels have stayed between 170 and 300 parts per million for the last 800,000 years, and any shifts took millennia to happen. But since about 1750, the start of the Industrial age, the level has ascended from 280 to more than 400 parts per million. The rise in carbon dioxide matches well with the curve of known human emissions. And these two curves match very well with the increase in temperature. The overwhelming evidence shows that carbon dioxide emissions are the dominant factor driving climate change.

Hear a 15-minute climate-science refresher from Peter deMenocal, dean of science, Columbia University, March 1, 2017 


Get our newsletter

I'd like to get more stories like this.
Email address
Secure and Spam free...

Leave a Reply

2 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
roger moellerPaulRon Recent comment authors
newest oldest most voted
Notify of

Bull puckey.
This supposed Science 101 of Climate Change did not go into how the science going from 280 ppm to approaching 400 ppm, or an additional 120 ppm is the cause of gloabal warming. 120 ppm is .012% parts more of CO2.
Please explain the real science involved in this difference causing global warming?
Then also explain what measurement devises were used in 1880 compared to today.
In fact explain how many measuring devises are used world wide to measure an increase of 1degree C?
Also a short reminder Temperature is not Linear!


Hi Ron, I’m not a scientist I’m a layman who did science at school in the 60s and I’m just trying to understand exactly how 0.04% CO2 in the atmosphere drives global warming. I’ve searched the internet but so far can’t find any articles or documents that explain the science. I’ve read plenty that says 97% of greenhouse gases is water vapour and logic suggests this, not CO2, would be the major driving element. Also the solar cycles / sun spots appear to have an impact on climate. Would someone point me at some technical articles that explain exactly how… Read more »

roger moeller
roger moeller

There is no science behind this conclusion. It just shows atmospheric carbon content and global atmospheric ave temperature. There are many more variables that are not mentioned. For instance water vapor is a greater greenhouse gas that CO. Thats why on cloudy nights it generally stays warmer.
Part of global warming are natural cycles in the climate. During the jurassic period it was very warm on the earth. Did the dinosaurs drive too many big suv’s?