<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of the Planet &#187; public policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/tag/public-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 04:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding GHG emissions: Stock vs. Flows</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/07/18/understanding-ghg-emissions-stock-vs-flows/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/07/18/understanding-ghg-emissions-stock-vs-flows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diego Villarreal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change and Decision Making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=16316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="150" height="110" src="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/flue_gas-150x110.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="flue_gas" />In discussing climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, a key distinction must be made between the stock of GHGs in the atmosphere, and the flow of GHGs, primarily emissions. Understanding this difference is crucial for designing and implementing policies to effectively address the problem. Because a bathtub is something that most of us are [<a href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/07/18/understanding-ghg-emissions-stock-vs-flows/">...</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/07/18/understanding-ghg-emissions-stock-vs-flows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cash for More Than Just Clunkers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/08/05/cash-for-more-than-just-clunkers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/08/05/cash-for-more-than-just-clunkers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus plan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our inability to predict policy outcomes was once again confirmed this week by the wildly popular Cash for Clunkers program. The program provides between $3,500 and $4,500 to anyone who trades in an older auto for a shiny new car that has better fuel efficiency. One billion dollars was originally allocated for the program, which [<a href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/08/05/cash-for-more-than-just-clunkers/">...</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/08/05/cash-for-more-than-just-clunkers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
