<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of the Planet &#187; MESTC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/tag/mestc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 20:23:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Illuminating the Science: Art and Climate Change Part II</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/04/27/illuminating-the-science-art-and-climate-change-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/04/27/illuminating-the-science-art-and-climate-change-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan Jones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communicating Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MESTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tipping point]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/climate/?p=1729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I expressed some skepticism that art and climate science were complementary languages. I also expressed some hope that the nature of these two fields – that is, that they both are ways of better knowing the world – really were reconcilable, and could create a better robustness of understanding the natural world. I&#8217;m glad [<a href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/04/27/illuminating-the-science-art-and-climate-change-part-ii/">...</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/04/27/illuminating-the-science-art-and-climate-change-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
