<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>State of the Planet &#187; Copenhagen 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/tag/copenhagen-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu</link>
	<description>In December 2009, world leaders convened at the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen. The Copenhagen Accord, presented at the conclusion, acknowledged the threat of global warming, but many felt the nonbinding agreement would do little to slow the pace of climate change. In this series of essays and interviews, Earth Institute scientists and representatives offer their insights on the conference and its legacy.
</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:33:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Denmark&#8217;s New Mark: Fossil-free by 2050</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/10/18/denmarks-new-mark-fossil-free-by-2050/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/10/18/denmarks-new-mark-fossil-free-by-2050/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie Horner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty / Economic Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water matters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=7649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="150" height="110" src="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/denmark_wind_offshore-150x110.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="denmark_wind_offshore" />Last Monday, October 11th, Columbia University’s Earth Institute and the Consulate General of Denmark co-hosted “The Climate Challenge: Revitalizing the Debate”. The daylong symposium included three panel sessions, in which experts from academia, the private sector, government and non-governmental organizations discussed the effects and implications of global climate change as well as steps –both taken [<a href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/10/18/denmarks-new-mark-fossil-free-by-2050/">...</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/10/18/denmarks-new-mark-fossil-free-by-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deutsche Bank and Columbia Climate Center Enhance Global Climate Change Policy Tracker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/09/01/deutsche-bank-and-columbia-climate-center-enhance-global-climate-change-policy-tracker/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/09/01/deutsche-bank-and-columbia-climate-center-enhance-global-climate-change-policy-tracker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Rothenberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Climate Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Circle News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donor Partner News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=6085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img width="150" height="110" src="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Blog-Post-3-Solar-Panels-picture-150x110.jpg" class="attachment-post-thumbnail wp-post-image" alt="Blog Post--3 Solar Panels--picture" />The Earth Institute, Columbia University is pleased to announce that Deutsche Bank Climate Change Advisors (DBCCA) of Deutsche Asset Management will continue work with Columbia Climate Center (CCC) researchers to update and enhance their Global Climate Change Policy Tracker. The Policy Tracker is a computer model that estimates the impact of policies on greenhouse gas [<a href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/09/01/deutsche-bank-and-columbia-climate-center-enhance-global-climate-change-policy-tracker/">...</a>]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/09/01/deutsche-bank-and-columbia-climate-center-enhance-global-climate-change-policy-tracker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Copenhagen: The False “Victory”</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/copenhagen-the-false-victory/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/copenhagen-the-false-victory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Sachs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two years of climate change negotiations have now ended in a farce in Copenhagen. Rather than grappling with complex issues, President Barack Obama decided instead to declare victory with a vague statement of principles agreed with four other countries. The remaining 187 were handed a fait accompli , which some accepted and others denounced. After the fact, the United Nations has argued that the document was generally accepted, though for most on a take-it-or-leave-it basis [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/copenhagen-the-false-victory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whole-Earth Management</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/whole-earth-management/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/whole-earth-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cohen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issues that emerged at the Copenhagen climate conference serve to remind us of the difficulty of solving complicated cross-national environmental problems. Ever since Rachel Carson and Barry Commoner first popularized the idea of a single interconnected biosphere, it's been obvious that national sovereignty would make it difficult to solve some global environmental problems. The climate problem is  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/whole-earth-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Was No Big Bang, and There Won’t Be</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/there-was-no-big-bang-and-there-wont-be/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/there-was-no-big-bang-and-there-wont-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott Barrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The three pages of text that emerged after years of preparation and two weeks of intense negotiation in Copenhagen signally fail to address what the document correctly calls “one of the greatest challenges of our time” – global climate change. To many, the Copenhagen Accord will seem a setback; actually, it is a continuation of a long history of failure. The essential problem lies with the strategy of addressing this complex issue [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/there-was-no-big-bang-and-there-wont-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cities Are Moving Ahead</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/cities-are-moving-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/cities-are-moving-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Hammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although critics have given harsh assessments of from the international summit at the Bella Center in Copenhagen, most probably would have concurred with the positive message flowing out of Copenhagen City Hall, the site of the Climate Summit for Mayors. The mayors’ summit emphasized local action to address climate change [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/22/cities-are-moving-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The (Welcome) End of Unanimity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/21/the-welcome-end-of-unanimity/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/21/the-welcome-end-of-unanimity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc A. Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1074</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most common reaction to Copenhagen is dismay at the failure to reach binding emission reduction targets. But Copenhagen actually represents a major success.

Why? It signals, finally, the abandonment of an experiment in hyper-multilateralism that never had much chance of success. From the early days of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, the dominant view was that any agreement had to be negotiated among [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/21/the-welcome-end-of-unanimity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Many Fights Ahead</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/21/the-many-fights-ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/21/the-many-fights-ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael B. Gerrard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week ended with high drama and muddled results. As Friday's workday began, Danish television was trained on the convoy of vehicles that would take President Obama to the Bella Center as soon as Air Force One landed. The landing took place around 9 a.m., and the president was immediately taken to a meeting of world leaders. Notably absent was Premier Wen Jiabao of China, the country that arguably was holding [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/21/the-many-fights-ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Does the Science Say?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/18/what-does-the-science-say/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/18/what-does-the-science-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary-Elena Carr</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The negotiations in Copenhagen have been handled by politicians and policy makers. But there would be no climate negotiations if climate scientists had not identified evidence that humans could disrupt the natural carbon cycle, and affect the climate system. The fact that some 50,000 people and the heads of most nations have come together indicates that, if nothing else, scientists have been quite successful in engaging society [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/18/what-does-the-science-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Complex Models, Simple Solutions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/18/complex-models-simple-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/18/complex-models-simple-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Schmidt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Earth Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copenhagen 2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copenhagen climate conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone knows that climate change is complex. The multitude of potential impacts, the uncertainties in projections, the intersection of historical responsibilities and current political realities all make negotiations fiendishly difficult. But can the very complexity of the subject be helpful in finding solutions? The answer might be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/12/18/complex-models-simple-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
