sandy-nasa FROM THE FIELD
Hurricane Sandy

Rebuilding After Hurricane Sandy

by |January 21, 2015
Rebuilding in Sea Bright, NJ Photo: FEMA

Rebuilding in Sea Bright, NJ Photo: FEMA

In June 2013, the Rebuild by Design competition was launched by the Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to find innovative solutions to the vulnerabilities of the region that Sandy exposed. Initially 148 teams made up of planners, designers, engineers and scientists from around the world submitted ideas. Ultimately six projects were chosen, and in June, HUD awarded $920 million of disaster recovery funding to begin implementing them.

The winning projects were selected for their excellence in design and resilience, and engagement with local communities. While they are regional in scope, they have the potential to serve as paradigms for ways to mitigate the effects of climate change and extreme weather anywhere in the world. The winners are:

 

The Big U 

BIG-UpicAwarded $335 million, this project will build a protective system around Manhattan from West 57th Street south, around the Battery to East 42nd Street. It will provide flood protection, and social and community benefits in various sections of the waterfront. The plans include a berm or raised barrier to protect the Lower East Side from storm surges and rising sea levels; deployable walls that flip down under FDR Drive between the Manhattan Bridge and Montgomery Street in case of flooding; and the Battery Berm, an elevated path through the Battery.

 

Living with the Bay 

NassauCty

This effort to make Nassau County’s south shore more resilient was awarded $125 million. The multi-pronged approach includes protective infrastructure that stores, cleans and replenishes storm water; constructed marshes to reduce wave action, enhance the ecology and provide recreational opportunities; and green infrastructure to store and filter water and provide public space.

 

 

The New Meadowlands 

Meadowlands

Incorporating transportation, ecology and development solutions for the New Jersey Meadowlands, this project was awarded $150 million. The Meadowpark, a large natural reserve with berms and marshes, will protect against ocean surges, collect rainfall, reduce sewage overflows and provide recreational opportunities. The Meadowband, offering flood protection, will be comprised of a street, bus rapid transit and public spaces. Development, currently mostly single-story warehouses, will be rezoned to include multi-story residences.

 

Resist, Delay, Store, Discharge

Hoboken

This comprehensive plan to protect Hoboken, Jersey City and Weehawken, N.J., from flooding and storm surges was awarded $230 million. It comprises hard infrastructure and soft landscaping to protect the coast and provide public spaces, green infrastructure to store and direct excess rainwater, water pumps and alternative drainage routes to discharge the water, and policy guidelines and recommendations.

 

Hunts Point Lifelines 

HuntsPoint

Awarded $20 million, this project will safeguard New York City’s food hub, which supplies food to 22 million people, from flooding. A waterfront greenway and new platforms will provide flood protection; the Levee Lab will be a place where innovative techniques for storm and flood protection can be explored. The plan will also create maritime emergency supply lines so that ships can transport food if roads are impassable, and a tri-generation plant for heating and refrigeration.

 

Living Breakwaters 

LivingBreakwaters

This project, awarded $60 million, will protect Staten Island, which was badly damaged by Hurricane Sandy because of its location at the mouth of the New York Bight.

Landscape architect Kate Orff, associate professor at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation and founder of SCAPE/Landscape Architecture, which leads the Living Breakwaters team, said by email, “Living Breakwaters was conceived as a pilot project for jointly evaluating ecosystem benefits, risk reduction techniques and social resiliency, and we believe that a thoughtful and responsive design process can help advance a more holistic method and model for building shoreline resiliency.”

Risk from storm surge, waves and erosion will be reduced through a layered system including a constructed “necklace of breakwaters” (rocky sloped walls placed in the water) along the south shore that can reduce wave heights by 4 feet and provide habitat for marine life. Exposed breakwaters will protect communities. Sub-tidal breakwaters, which will protect parkland, will be “constructed reefs” which can slow shoreline erosion and, with their varied texture and niches, provide new habitat for marine creatures. Calming the waves will also serve to increase sedimentation, which replenishes beaches, and encourage more shoreline recreation.

In addition, Living Breakwaters aims to restore the oyster beds that once supported a thriving industry in Raritan Bay. Oysters will filter and clean water, and their beds of layered shells will reinforce the breakwaters. The New York Harbor School, one of SCAPE’s partners, features a curriculum of estuary stewardship centered on oyster gardening. The school is also the production hub for The Billion Oyster Project, a long-term project to restore a billion oysters to the harbor and train thousands of students to be stewards of their local marine environment.

Community members and stakeholders are involved in brainstorming designs and functions of “Water Hubs,” the on-land component of Living Breakwaters. To promote social resiliency, Water Hubs will offer space for people to gather, attend classes, dine and store equipment, and provide amenities like bathrooms and water fountains. Each hub will be shaped by its particular community’s needs.

“The project is advancing a whole-systems based approach on multiple fronts—with further development of social, ecological, risk reduction facets,” said Orff. “And it is being led by the HUD grantee, the New York State Governor’s Office of Storm Recovery, which is developing an amendment to the State’s Action Plan for the allocated Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery funds…it will be available for public review in early 2015.”

The project will require further design development with input from stakeholders—community activists, residents, environmental advocates, regulators and policy makers. In addition, physical and digital modeling are required as part of the design process to assess wave and erosion reduction, sedimentation and water quality, overall performance, evaluation and aesthetics.

Construction will begin after the environmental review and designs are completed. A pilot project is planned for Tottenville to test a variety of breakwaters and a Water Hub. The pilot project will enable the team to gauge impacts and figure out how best to scale up the designs.

Because Living Breakwaters goes against conventional planning norms by integrating ecological, social and risk reduction goals, “This approach by its very nature exposes implementation hurdles and challenges, in particular the unknowns of underwater permitting and regulatory review,” explained Orff.

Living Breakwaters will need to be physically feasible, as well as permittable and fundable within the complex political and regulatory milieu of New York Harbor.

Klaus Jacob, special research scientist at the Earth Institute’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, served as an advisor for part of the Rebuild by Design competition. His role was to familiarize the teams with climate change and sea level rise forecasts, as well as the social and economic conditions of the region.

Initially, Rebuild by Design teams brainstormed new ideas, Jacob said, but as the teams talked to stakeholders and community members who wanted their needs met immediately, the ideas were whittled down to be “more ordinary.”

“They don’t have the patience to look 50 to 100 years into the future,” he said.

Jacob is concerned that in the end, the projects largely emphasize protection rather than adaptation or “strategic resettlement.” He explained that there are three fundamental options for adapting to rising sea levels and storm surges: protection against water, adaptation to water (learning to live with it), and strategic relocation.  Strategic relocation can involve vertically raising structures in place or relocating them to higher ground. The latter, said Jacob, is the most sustainable and resilient option.

“The time horizons for the designs are too short. Most of the Rebuild by Design projects had the 2050s in mind, with a two-and-a-half-foot sea level rise,” Jacob said. “But sea level rises constantly reduce the safety of what you have originally designed for the 2050s.”

Unlike the other projects, Living Breakwaters does not attempt to defend against sea level rise or directly protect any land structures; rather its aim is to diminish storm surge height.  Said Jacob, “Orff’s project is an elegant way to provide a buffer that gives you time to do more fundamental changes on land and shore.”

According to the New York City Panel on Climate Change (NPCC) report for 2013, mid-range projections for sea level rise in the 2050s are 11 to 24 inches; the high estimate is 31 inches.

NY sea level rise map  Photo: FEMA

NY sea level rise map
Photo: FEMA

Cynthia Rosenzweig, co-chair of the NPCC, and a senior research scientist at the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and Columbia University’s Earth Institute, and her team have just completed the NPCC 2015 report. While it acknowledges uncertainties, it projects a high end of sea level rise of up to 6 feet by 2100.

Rosenzweig explained that the NPCC projections for 2050 and 2100, which were provided to all the Rebuild by Design teams, were taken into consideration in the basic planning stages, and she feels strongly that the six teams need to incorporate the science from the NPCC as the projects progress.

“The NPCC recommends a flexible adaptation approach which recognizes that climate conditions will be changing,” said Rosenzweig. “That means these interventions need to evolve with time. It is important, if and when they get built, that there be an indication and monitoring system to go along with each. They need to ask ‘Is it working?’ ‘How are conditions changing?’ ‘What do we need to do to adjust the interventions?’”

In addition, the NPCC emphasizes the need to utilize a portfolio of resiliency approaches, not just one. Rosenzweig explained that the various approaches include engineering solutions like flood barriers and berms; ecosystem strategies like breakwaters that provide habitat; and social programs. While the projects consulted with stakeholders and community members, she noted that they generally seem more focused on engineering and ecosystem strategies, with some emphasizing one aspect over the other. There are also social programs, she said, that could be incorporated into the projects, such as buddy systems for older people when a storm approaches, or insurance strategies.

Ultimately, Rosenzweig would like to see a comprehensive metropolitan regional approach to the risks of climate change—an overarching perspective that links these iconic individual projects in different areas, addresses all stakeholder needs, and takes into consideration the challenges of the entire region.

Nevertheless, Jacob said, “If you compare what existed before after other disasters when FEMA (The Federal Emergency Management Agency) would just give out money and restore what had existed before, then Rebuild by Design is a huge success.”

Hurricane Sandy and the competition marked a tipping point. “It was the first time in New York City and in the U.S. after which you cannot rebuild with business as usual,” said Rosenzweig. “No project can ever again be built without taking the increasing risks of climate change and sea level rise into account.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *