<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Billion Gallons a Day, Naturally</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2012/01/23/one-billion-gallons-a-day-naturally/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2012/01/23/one-billion-gallons-a-day-naturally/</link>
	<description>Tapping experts in climate, geology, oceanography, ecology, sustainable development, global health, energy, food and water, State of the Planet captures stories of how the Earth works and how we can sustainably make our lives better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:26:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Barnes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2012/01/23/one-billion-gallons-a-day-naturally/comment-page-1/#comment-39212</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 20:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=21957#comment-39212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, Richard-- that is truly an impressive study. Thank you for the link.

When I visited the Neversink watershed last month we discussed the profound shift in precipitation patterns, particularly in light of Irene and Lee—I heard &#039;hundred-year flood&#039; tossed around a few times.
Amazingly, throughout the entirety of the crisis virtually no water was softened or lost. New York&#039;s water is exceedingly well-suited to withstand climate variability and change in that direction. 

However, along with the potential horrors of Marcellus Shale, I agree with you in the assertion that a return to pre-60&#039;s precipitation levels and certainly to the drought conditions of the 60&#039;s constitute the greatest danger to the continuing success of our water supply system.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Richard&#8211; that is truly an impressive study. Thank you for the link.</p>
<p>When I visited the Neversink watershed last month we discussed the profound shift in precipitation patterns, particularly in light of Irene and Lee—I heard &#8216;hundred-year flood&#8217; tossed around a few times.<br />
Amazingly, throughout the entirety of the crisis virtually no water was softened or lost. New York&#8217;s water is exceedingly well-suited to withstand climate variability and change in that direction. </p>
<p>However, along with the potential horrors of Marcellus Shale, I agree with you in the assertion that a return to pre-60&#8242;s precipitation levels and certainly to the drought conditions of the 60&#8242;s constitute the greatest danger to the continuing success of our water supply system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Seager</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2012/01/23/one-billion-gallons-a-day-naturally/comment-page-1/#comment-38484</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Seager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=21957#comment-38484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the NYC water supply system is a wonder.  Our study of the precipitation history in the Catskills watershed - the 1960s drought and the wet climate that has followed - is described here:
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/drought/catskills.shtml
I think the water supply is fairly well placed to withstand climate variability and climate change but these factors need to be considered - along with hydrofracking of course - in order to ensure good quality water for the city for ever more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the NYC water supply system is a wonder.  Our study of the precipitation history in the Catskills watershed &#8211; the 1960s drought and the wet climate that has followed &#8211; is described here:<br />
<a href="http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/drought/catskills.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/res/div/ocp/drought/catskills.shtml</a><br />
I think the water supply is fairly well placed to withstand climate variability and climate change but these factors need to be considered &#8211; along with hydrofracking of course &#8211; in order to ensure good quality water for the city for ever more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
