<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What are the Keystone XL Pipeline Risks to Water Resources?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/</link>
	<description>Tapping experts in climate, geology, oceanography, ecology, sustainable development, global health, energy, food and water, State of the Planet captures stories of how the Earth works and how we can sustainably make our lives better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Gleick: The Keystone XL Pipeline — Red Herring, Symbol, or a Piece of a Puzzle? &#124; Circle of Blue WaterNews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-169644</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Gleick: The Keystone XL Pipeline — Red Herring, Symbol, or a Piece of a Puzzle? &#124; Circle of Blue WaterNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=18683#comment-169644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservation Science News February 15, 2013 &#124; PRBO Science News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-154969</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservation Science News February 15, 2013 &#124; PRBO Science News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=18683#comment-154969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Keystone XL Pipeline: Red herring, symbol, or a piece of a puzzle? [Significant Figures] &#8592; Test Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-153341</link>
		<dc:creator>The Keystone XL Pipeline: Red herring, symbol, or a piece of a puzzle? [Significant Figures] &#8592; Test Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=18683#comment-153341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Keystone XL Pipeline: Red herring, symbol, or a piece of a puzzle? &#8211; Significant Figures</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-153020</link>
		<dc:creator>The Keystone XL Pipeline: Red herring, symbol, or a piece of a puzzle? &#8211; Significant Figures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2013 20:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=18683#comment-153020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] threat to global climate is small. Opponents cite concerns about pipeline spills and safety, major water contamination and consumption during production and transportation, greenhouse gas emissions, and expanded dependence on fossil [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia Apland Hitz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-24171</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia Apland Hitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=18683#comment-24171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you say, David, a review of the full range of potential Keystone XL impacts would be a much larger undertaking.  Thank you for contributing to the discussion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, David, a review of the full range of potential Keystone XL impacts would be a much larger undertaking.  Thank you for contributing to the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Groenfeldt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/10/10/what-are-the-keystonexl-pipeline-risks-to-water-resources/comment-page-1/#comment-24163</link>
		<dc:creator>David Groenfeldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 12:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=18683#comment-24163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a refreshing overview, laying out the arguments on both sides of the pipeline issue, but that&#039;s exactly the problem.  By focusing only on the environmental impacts of the pipeline, the &quot;forest&quot; of Tar Sands mining and the impact on those lands (in Canada) and on the planet, are left out of the picture.  The &quot;real&quot; environmental impacts of the pipeline include all those scales, just as corporations concerned about the sustainability of their products have to include their whole production line in their analysis.   The US State Department has adopted Britain&#039;s strategy of &quot;Divide and Conquer&quot; in holding community sessions along the proposed pipeline route and asking, in effect, whether those folks are interested in jobs.  Of course they are!  But taking a larger frame, there is a huge environmental, economic, cultural (the native tribes in Alberta have been fighting the Tar Sands for years with little press coverage) and moral cost to building the pipeline.   If you&#039;re interested in this kind of perspective, check out the Water Ethics Network (click on www.waterculture.org &gt; Initiatives &gt; Water Ethics Network).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a refreshing overview, laying out the arguments on both sides of the pipeline issue, but that&#8217;s exactly the problem.  By focusing only on the environmental impacts of the pipeline, the &#8220;forest&#8221; of Tar Sands mining and the impact on those lands (in Canada) and on the planet, are left out of the picture.  The &#8220;real&#8221; environmental impacts of the pipeline include all those scales, just as corporations concerned about the sustainability of their products have to include their whole production line in their analysis.   The US State Department has adopted Britain&#8217;s strategy of &#8220;Divide and Conquer&#8221; in holding community sessions along the proposed pipeline route and asking, in effect, whether those folks are interested in jobs.  Of course they are!  But taking a larger frame, there is a huge environmental, economic, cultural (the native tribes in Alberta have been fighting the Tar Sands for years with little press coverage) and moral cost to building the pipeline.   If you&#8217;re interested in this kind of perspective, check out the Water Ethics Network (click on <a href="http://www.waterculture.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.waterculture.org</a> &gt; Initiatives &gt; Water Ethics Network).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
