<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Big Earthquakes Disrupt World Weather?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/04/28/can-big-earthquakes-disrupt-world-weather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/04/28/can-big-earthquakes-disrupt-world-weather/</link>
	<description>Tapping experts in climate, geology, oceanography, ecology, sustainable development, global health, energy, food and water, State of the Planet captures stories of how the Earth works and how we can sustainably make our lives better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Reimers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2011/04/28/can-big-earthquakes-disrupt-world-weather/comment-page-1/#comment-17779</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Reimers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=14075#comment-17779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hear counter arguments all the time about how the natural cycles of earth account for the global warming we have experienced over the past century. As discussed in the article, these cycles are quite long when compared to the very short time frame of the recent intense global warming. We&#039;re talking 10&#039;s of thousands of years vs a couple of decades. Anyway, it&#039;s comforting to know that even the most powerful earthquake won&#039;t send us into the next ice age. 

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear counter arguments all the time about how the natural cycles of earth account for the global warming we have experienced over the past century. As discussed in the article, these cycles are quite long when compared to the very short time frame of the recent intense global warming. We&#8217;re talking 10&#8242;s of thousands of years vs a couple of decades. Anyway, it&#8217;s comforting to know that even the most powerful earthquake won&#8217;t send us into the next ice age. </p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
