<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeffrey Sachs and Senator John Kerry on Energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/11/19/jeffrey-sachs-and-senator-john-kerry-on-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/11/19/jeffrey-sachs-and-senator-john-kerry-on-energy/</link>
	<description>Tapping experts in climate, geology, oceanography, ecology, sustainable development, global health, energy, food and water, State of the Planet captures stories of how the Earth works and how we can sustainably make our lives better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:16:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Newberry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/11/19/jeffrey-sachs-and-senator-john-kerry-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>James Newberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=8749#comment-3481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first step for transitioning to truly clean energy is to eliminate massive total direct and indirect fiscal and economic subsidies for mining of &quot;fuels.&quot; These &quot;fuels&quot; are the four horsemen of energy, climate and national insecurity (uranium, coal, petroleum and mined methane). 

Government handouts, including tax expensing, are known as perverse economic subsidies because of their many damaging public impacts. They represent a failed policy of &quot;cheap fuels.&quot; If we want a price on mined substances that are contaminating, especially fossil carbon, then first stop subsidizing them. Otherwise the talk is just more economic fraud, which already seems pervasive enough thanks to (the oxymoron of) our investment banking &quot;industry.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first step for transitioning to truly clean energy is to eliminate massive total direct and indirect fiscal and economic subsidies for mining of &#8220;fuels.&#8221; These &#8220;fuels&#8221; are the four horsemen of energy, climate and national insecurity (uranium, coal, petroleum and mined methane). </p>
<p>Government handouts, including tax expensing, are known as perverse economic subsidies because of their many damaging public impacts. They represent a failed policy of &#8220;cheap fuels.&#8221; If we want a price on mined substances that are contaminating, especially fossil carbon, then first stop subsidizing them. Otherwise the talk is just more economic fraud, which already seems pervasive enough thanks to (the oxymoron of) our investment banking &#8220;industry.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Morris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/11/19/jeffrey-sachs-and-senator-john-kerry-on-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-3303</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/?p=8749#comment-3303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only does Kerry not know what feed-in tariffs (the most successful policy for renewables all over the world) are, at around 5:30 minutes he claims that the United States &quot;does not have a single photovoltaics manufacturer in the top 10.&quot; In fact, the biggest firm in the world over the past few years was First Solar of the US:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2010/06/top-10-ten-largest-solar-pv-companies

And they only recently slipped to third place (behind to Chinese manufacturers) a few weeks ago:

http://www.solarnovus.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1600:first-solar-moving-to-third-place&amp;catid=37:business-news&amp;Itemid=241

This is the problem we face in the United States – because our politicians do not really have to compete with each other (google &quot;political gerrymandering&quot; – and don&#039;t even get me started about Citizens...), you do not have to be more knowledgeable than Kerry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only does Kerry not know what feed-in tariffs (the most successful policy for renewables all over the world) are, at around 5:30 minutes he claims that the United States &#8220;does not have a single photovoltaics manufacturer in the top 10.&#8221; In fact, the biggest firm in the world over the past few years was First Solar of the US:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2010/06/top-10-ten-largest-solar-pv-companies" rel="nofollow">http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2010/06/top-10-ten-largest-solar-pv-companies</a></p>
<p>And they only recently slipped to third place (behind to Chinese manufacturers) a few weeks ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.solarnovus.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=1600:first-solar-moving-to-third-place&#038;catid=37:business-news&#038;Itemid=241" rel="nofollow">http://www.solarnovus.com/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=article&#038;id=1600:first-solar-moving-to-third-place&#038;catid=37:business-news&#038;Itemid=241</a></p>
<p>This is the problem we face in the United States – because our politicians do not really have to compete with each other (google &#8220;political gerrymandering&#8221; – and don&#8217;t even get me started about Citizens&#8230;), you do not have to be more knowledgeable than Kerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
