<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Policy Buffet (Part 1): Making Sense of the Senate’s Climate and Energy Proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/06/21/the-policy-buffet-part-1-making-sense-of-the-senates-climate-and-energy-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/06/21/the-policy-buffet-part-1-making-sense-of-the-senates-climate-and-energy-proposals/</link>
	<description>Tapping experts in climate, geology, oceanography, ecology, sustainable development, global health, energy, food and water, State of the Planet captures stories of how the Earth works and how we can sustainably make our lives better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 17:52:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Policy Buffet (Part 5): How the Oil Spill Killed the Climate Bill (and Why the Economy Didn&#8217;t Help, Either) &#8211; Climate Matters - State of the Planet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/06/21/the-policy-buffet-part-1-making-sense-of-the-senates-climate-and-energy-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>The Policy Buffet (Part 5): How the Oil Spill Killed the Climate Bill (and Why the Economy Didn&#8217;t Help, Either) &#8211; Climate Matters - State of the Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/climate/?p=1863#comment-1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] come and gone. Just two months ago, it seemed as though the bill stood a fighting chance, given the buffet of options available to policymakers. Then we watched as partisanship, infighting and smear campaigns [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] come and gone. Just two months ago, it seemed as though the bill stood a fighting chance, given the buffet of options available to policymakers. Then we watched as partisanship, infighting and smear campaigns [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Policy Buffet (Part 3): As Kerry-Lieberman Fades, a Fresh Start for Cap-and-Trade? &#8211; Climate Matters - State of the Planet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/06/21/the-policy-buffet-part-1-making-sense-of-the-senates-climate-and-energy-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>The Policy Buffet (Part 3): As Kerry-Lieberman Fades, a Fresh Start for Cap-and-Trade? &#8211; Climate Matters - State of the Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 15:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/climate/?p=1863#comment-876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is the third post in a series that covers the Senates current energy and climate proposals. The introductory post can be found here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is the third post in a series that covers the Senates current energy and climate proposals. The introductory post can be found here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Policy Buffet (Part 2): Understanding the American Power Act - Climate Matters @ Columbia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/06/21/the-policy-buffet-part-1-making-sense-of-the-senates-climate-and-energy-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-651</link>
		<dc:creator>The Policy Buffet (Part 2): Understanding the American Power Act - Climate Matters @ Columbia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/climate/?p=1863#comment-651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This is the second post in a series that covers the Senate’s current energy and climate proposals. The introductory post can be found here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is the second post in a series that covers the Senate’s current energy and climate proposals. The introductory post can be found here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate News Roundup &#8212; Week of 6/14 - Climate Matters @ Columbia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2010/06/21/the-policy-buffet-part-1-making-sense-of-the-senates-climate-and-energy-proposals/comment-page-1/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate News Roundup &#8212; Week of 6/14 - Climate Matters @ Columbia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/climate/?p=1863#comment-650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The American Power Act – the energy and climate bill co-sponsored by Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) – has been evaluated by the EPA as costing the average American household roughly $146 per year. The bill aims to reduce carbon emissions by 80% in 2050 in part by affixing a cost to carbon of about $17 per metric ton in 2013, to $24 per ton in 2020. The higher cost of energy would presumably be passed on to the consumer, which posits a significant political hurdle to the passage of the bill. Kerry and Lieberman – as well as the Obama administration – have been quick to point out, however, that $146 per year translates to roughly 40 cents per day – less than the cost of a first-class postage stamp.  In Lieberman’s own words, &#8220;Is the American household willing to pay less than $1 so we don&#8217;t have to buy oil from foreign countries, so we can create millions of new jobs, so we can clean up our environment? I think the answer is going to be yes.&#8221; For an explanation of the various bills under discussion, you can click through to our upcoming series on the policy buffet. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The American Power Act – the energy and climate bill co-sponsored by Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) – has been evaluated by the EPA as costing the average American household roughly $146 per year. The bill aims to reduce carbon emissions by 80% in 2050 in part by affixing a cost to carbon of about $17 per metric ton in 2013, to $24 per ton in 2020. The higher cost of energy would presumably be passed on to the consumer, which posits a significant political hurdle to the passage of the bill. Kerry and Lieberman – as well as the Obama administration – have been quick to point out, however, that $146 per year translates to roughly 40 cents per day – less than the cost of a first-class postage stamp.  In Lieberman’s own words, &#8220;Is the American household willing to pay less than $1 so we don&#8217;t have to buy oil from foreign countries, so we can create millions of new jobs, so we can clean up our environment? I think the answer is going to be yes.&#8221; For an explanation of the various bills under discussion, you can click through to our upcoming series on the policy buffet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
