<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will the economy call the EPA’s bluff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/03/24/will-the-economy-call-the-epas-bluff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/03/24/will-the-economy-call-the-epas-bluff/</link>
	<description>Tapping experts in climate, geology, oceanography, ecology, sustainable development, global health, energy, food and water, State of the Planet captures stories of how the Earth works and how we can sustainably make our lives better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:28:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EPA Under Attack &#8211; Climate Matters - State of the Planet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/03/24/will-the-economy-call-the-epas-bluff/comment-page-1/#comment-12014</link>
		<dc:creator>EPA Under Attack &#8211; Climate Matters - State of the Planet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate.columbia.edu/blog/?p=418#comment-12014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and welfare, the Court ruling supports that the EPA has the duty to regulate these emissions (see here for more on this endangerment [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and welfare, the Court ruling supports that the EPA has the duty to regulate these emissions (see here for more on this endangerment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jeremiah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/03/24/will-the-economy-call-the-epas-bluff/comment-page-1/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>David Jeremiah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 02:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate.columbia.edu/blog/?p=418#comment-107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not convinced yet of any sincerity of national and world leaders to set the system in right mode. The last 40 years shows a blatant track record of pure disregard for civilized, peaceful and harmonious living due to the socio-economic and political structures in place. We are living in the 11th hour but it looks like Obama and Team are waiting for 11.55pm. Visit: www.theglobalchallenges.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not convinced yet of any sincerity of national and world leaders to set the system in right mode. The last 40 years shows a blatant track record of pure disregard for civilized, peaceful and harmonious living due to the socio-economic and political structures in place. We are living in the 11th hour but it looks like Obama and Team are waiting for 11.55pm. Visit: <a href="http://www.theglobalchallenges.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theglobalchallenges.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krute</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/03/24/will-the-economy-call-the-epas-bluff/comment-page-1/#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Krute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate.columbia.edu/blog/?p=418#comment-106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do agree with what lena said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with what lena said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ei.columbia.edu/2009/03/24/will-the-economy-call-the-epas-bluff/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Lena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://climate.columbia.edu/blog/?p=418#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All excellent points, but one reason for action in 2009 is for the international negotiations in the next Conference of Parties. December 2009 in Copenhagen is an important opportunity for the US to show leadership. Do you think that is justification for trying to move faster?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All excellent points, but one reason for action in 2009 is for the international negotiations in the next Conference of Parties. December 2009 in Copenhagen is an important opportunity for the US to show leadership. Do you think that is justification for trying to move faster?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
