In regard to plants exposed after glacial retreat, I’m seeing lots of “about” and “approximately” regarding dates. If it’s true that plants would have decayed and decomposed had they been exposed prior to the present day, then how is it that some of the plants could be 5000 yrs old and others 7000 yrs old. It would seem to me that in order for the 5000 yr old plants to have grown, a significantly warmer climate would’ve have been needed which would have exposed the 7000 yr old plants and decomposed them 5000 yrs ago.

It makes more sense that we’re talking about a single major abrupt change that suddenly flash froze all the newly discovered plants and that the real reason for getting all these wildly fluctuating dates is that carbon 14 dating is just hugely inexact.

Lonnie mentions “Oetzi” as supporting evidence of this major climactic event. What about the wholly mammoths? These have been found frozen in ice all over the place. I would think that these would also tie in to the same event. I’m surprised that he didn’t cite any of those discoveries.